A brief history of breast enlargements

News for 29 March 2012 was taken from BBC News.

It is 50 years since the first breast enlargement using silicone implants. Today it rates as the second-most popular form of cosmetic surgery worldwide, undergone by 1.5 million women in 2010.

It was spring 1962 when Timmie Jean Lindsey, a mother-of-six lay down on the operating table at Jefferson Davis hospital in Houston, Texas.

Over the next two hours, she went from a B to a C cup, in an operation that made history.

“I thought they came out just perfect… They felt soft and just like real breasts,” says Lindsey now aged 80.

“I don’t think I got the full results of them until I went out in public and men on the street would whistle at me.”

Though the operation boosted her self-confidence – and she enjoyed the extra attention – she had never planned to have a breast augmentation.

Lindsey had been to hospital to get a tattoo removed from her breasts, and it was then that doctors asked if she would consider volunteering for this first-of-its-kind operation.

“I was more concerned about getting my ears pinned back… My ears stood out like Dumbo! And they said ‘Oh we’ll do that too.’” So a deal was struck.

The surgeons were two ambitious pioneers, Frank Gerow and Thomas Cronin.

It was Gerow who had first come up with the plan for a new kind of breast implant.

“Frank Gerow squeezed a plastic blood bag and remarked how much it felt like a woman’s breast,” says Teresa Riordan, author of Inventing Beauty: A History of the Innovations that have Made Us Beautiful.

“And he had this ‘Aha!’ moment, where he first conceived of the silicone breast implant.”

The first guinea pig for the silicone implant was a dog named Esmeralda. The basic principle behind the prototype was simple.

“A rocket achieves lift off with lift and thrust – same thing in breast augmentation,” says Thomas Biggs, who was working with Gerow and Cronin in 1962 as a junior resident in plastic surgery.

“I was in charge of the dog. The implant was inserted under the skin and left for a couple of weeks, until she chewed at her stitches and it had to be removed.”

The operation was deemed a success and Gerow declared that the implants were “as harmless as water”. Soon after, the medical team began looking for women to try out the implants.

Timmie Jean Lindsey has only a hazy recollection of her operation day.

“As I came back from surgery there was just a lot of weight on my chest – like something heavy had been sitting there.”

“That was about it – after maybe three or four days the pain part of it had let up.”

The doctors were pleased with their work. But, at the time, Biggs had no idea quite what they had on their hands.

“Sure it was a little bit exciting, but if I’d had a mirror to the future I’d have been dumbstruck,” he says.

“I was not wise enough to realise the magnitude of it.”

The significance began to hit home when Cronin presented the work at the International Society of Plastic Surgeons in Washington DC in 1963. “The plastic surgery world was absolutely set on fire with enthusiasm,” says Biggs.

The time seemed right. 1950s America had seen a whole swathe of cultural influences come together around the ideal of a larger breast.

It was the decade in which Playboy magazine and Barbie launched, and film stars played a big role too.

“The busty look of Marilyn Monroe and Jane Russell and also Dior’s New Look of 1957, really emphasised this curvy silhouette, and got women thinking about augmenting their breasts,” says Teresa Riordan.

“Falsies” – basically stuffed bras – were popular, but increasingly women wanted something more.

Through the years, all manner of approaches had been tried to increase breast size. In the 1950s, doctors started inserting sponge implants into women’s breasts. Some allege that Marilyn Monroe had this operation, though this is hotly contested.

Monroe biographer Anthony Summers says people he interviewed for his book, who knew her well – including Billy Travilla, who was both her dressmaker and one of her lovers – said she had no reason at all to have any breast enhancement.

“The filmmaker Billy Wilder described Monroe’s bosom as, ‘a miracle of shape, density and an apparent lack of gravity,’” he says.

The sponge technique worked well at first, but did not last – the sponges soon shrank, and became “hard as baseballs” says Biggs.

Silicone was also a material of the moment. “There was a post-war American fascination with all things plastic and artificial,” says Riordan.

It is not in the US, though, that the silicone was first used for breast enlargement, but in Japan, where it was tried out by prostitutes.

Eager to do better trade with the occupying US forces, who they presumed preferred a larger chest, they experimented by injecting silicone – stolen from the docks of Yokohama – direct into the breast.

These injections turned out to have a nasty side-effect known as “silicone rot”, in which gangrene set in around the injection site.

The early silicone breast implants pioneered in the US fortunately avoided this hitch, but were not entirely problem-free.

Hematoma, where blood collects in a swelling, was one early difficulty. There were cases of infections too, and also “fibrous capsular contractions” where a scar would form, making the implant hard.

“We are not worshipping what we had 50 years ago, because that’s history,” says Biggs.

There have been many advances over the decades, like 3D-imaging, and implants that are increasingly rupture-proof – and the range has widened.

“In the early days, we only had four choices or sizes – large, medium, small and petite. Now we have over 450 choices,” says Biggs.

Around the world, breast enlargement is now the second-most popular cosmetic surgery operation, after liposuction (the removal of fat). In many countries – including the UK – it is the most popular operation.

It’s not only used by women who want to perfect their body shape but also by patients who have undergone mastectomy as a result of breast cancer. This was something Gerow and Cronin envisaged from the start, and one of their motives for developing the operation.

For many years, Timmie Jean Lindsey kept fairly quiet about her breast enlargement – one boyfriend never knew for example, and it was only decades later that she told many of her friends and family about it.

Fifty years on she remains delighted with the results, though there is no stopping the passing of time, she says.

“You would think they would stay real perky, but no – they are just like a regular breasts, they begin to sag over the years. That surprised me. I figured they’d just stay where they were.”

But she still very happy with the little piece of history she carries inside her body.

“It’s kind of awesome to know that I was first,” she says.

Blog extra: Podcast (below) of Witness interview with Timmie Jean Lindsey (part of BBC World Service).


Visit the BBC site here for other Witness podcasts.

Men walk a mile in high heels to raise awareness of sexual violence

News for 28 March 2012 was taken from Women’s Views on News.

Men of Western Kentucky University’s ‘Chi Omega’ fraternity house recently hosted a ‘Walk a Mile in Her Shoes’ event to raise awareness of violence against women.

Walking in red high heels, the men raised $1,000 for Hope Harbor, an organization that provides services for victims of sexual assault.
But they weren’t only interested in raising awareness of violence against women. The goal was also to achieve better communication about sexualized violence, a topic that men find hard to discuss.

They also want to help men understand and sympathise with women’s experiences, so they can change perspectives, improve gender relationships and decrease the potential for violence.

Statistics from the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network show that, in the US, a woman is raped every two minutes.

The ‘Walk a Mile in Her Shoes’ campaign is an international men’s march to stop rape, sexual assault and gender violence, described as “a playful opportunity for men to raise awareness in their community about the serious causes, effects and remediations to sexualized violence”.

The walks are billed as political and performance art with public, personal and existential messages, with no distinction between performer and audience.

The mission of Walk a Mile is to create a unique and powerful public experience that educates individuals and communities about the causes of sexual violence, and provides prevention and remediation strategies.

France train firm pays out after delays cost woman job

News for 27 March 2012 has been taken from BBC News.

A court in France has ordered the national rail company, SNCF, to pay 1,500 euros (£1,250) in compensation to a commuter who lost her job because of delays.

Soazig Parassols was employed in Lyon for a trial period in June 2010 but she lost her secretarial job the following month because she was repeatedly late.

She argued her trains from Amberieu, 60km (37 miles) away, were delayed at least six times.

The court ruled this caused her stress.

Ms Parassols, 25, was awarded another 1,500 euros in legal costs, but the court decided she had not suffered financial loss and the total was far short of the 45,000 euros (£37,500) she had asked for.

During her month-long trial period the delays she experienced on the TER trains ranged from 10 minutes to 75 minutes.

The law firm in Lyon where she worked said her frequent late arrivals were damaging to the running of the company.

This is not the first time SNCF has had to compensate a customer for delays.

At the end of 2010 the train operator paid a lawyer nearly 5,000 euros (£4,170) when he missed a connection to Nimes for a meeting, according to Le Figaro newspaper.

Consumer associations warned the latest ruling could open the floodgates to other complaints.

Pressure pays off – at least one Saudi woman will take part at 2012 Olympics

News for 26 March 2012 has been taken from Women’s Views on News.

It has taken a damning 51-page report by Human Rights Watch (HRW), widespread condemnation from sporting and non-sporting bodies alike, and plenty of high-level diplomacy on the part of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), but is seems that the Saudi Arabian authorities will allow at least one woman to compete in the London Olympics.

Crown Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz said that female athletes will be allowed to go provided that “their sports meet the standards of women’s decency and don’t contradict Islamic laws.”

Tokenistic it may be, but until this week, even that seemed unlikely.  So, at this moment, the IOC will grab the concession with both hands.

The two other countries never to have sent a female competitor, Brunei and Qatar, have already indicated that they will comply with the Olympic Charter promoting gender equality.

This is especially pertinent to Qatar which has bid for the 2020 games and cannot hope to win if its discriminatory practises continue.

However, this Olympian ideal is a relatively new one.  The IOC itself has a less than impressive history of gender equality.

Established in 1894, there was no female committee member until 1981.  Today only 20 of the 106 committee members are women.  There were no women at all at the first modern games in 1896.

By 1912 the London games saw 44 women taking part, a meagre 2.2% of the total.  In 1996 there were still 26 all-male teams competing.  It wasn’t until 2007 that the Olympic Charter was amended to “encourage and support the promotion of women in sport at all levels and in all structures”.

By the 2008 Beijing Games women accounted for 42% of the total comptetitors with only Brunei, Qatar and Saudi Arabia sending an all-male team.

HRW has called the Saudi actions ”a positive step toward ending the country’s pervasive discrimination against women in sport.”  All well and good, but how ready  to take part can these women be ?

There are no physical education classes for girls in state-run schools. Conservative clerics have warned that the effort required in running and jumping may cause damage to a woman’s hymen and thus ruin her chances of marriage.

In a crackdown in 2009, women’s gyms, swimming pools and running tracks were closed.  There are no official sports facilties for women.

But there are women determined to take part in the sports they love.  There are underground athletics clubs and football teams established using hospitals and health clubs as bases, but participants are not going to be drawn from these.

IOC President, Jacques Rogge, has indicated that there may be options that would allow women who don’t meet the required standard to compete, but we are unlikely to know the final outcome until the meeting of the IOC Executive Board in Quebec at the end of May.

A list of  potential athletes has been put forward.  Favourite must be equestrienne Dalma Rushdi Malhas, who, when overlooked by the Saudi authorities for the 2010 Youth Games team, financed herself and won a bronze mendal at the games in Singapore.

Ironically, as an all-male equestrian team has already qualified for the games, Malhas would have to take the place of a man if she is to participate.  Indeed it may be that she will be the only one, although there are also suggestions the Saudis may send as many as three female officials to the games.

Although there is fierce opposition to the relaxing of the official Saudi stance, more liberal voices are making themselves heard, pointing out that the Koran does not specifically bar women from taking part in sport.

All of the women who currently do – both officially and unofficially – will be hoping that those voices gain sway in determining the future of their sporting lives and, indeed, their lives in general.

Until that time, they will have to hang their hopes on the token woman or women who make their high-profile appearance at this year’s Olympic Games.

Blog extra: Find out more about London 2012.

Dancing on Ice judge Katarina Witt talks money

News for 25 March 2012 has been taken from The Telegraph.

Olympic gold medallist Katarina Witt, talks about her passion for skating and growing up in East Germany.

HOW DID YOUR CHILDHOOD INFLUENCE YOUR WORK ETHIC?

My mum was a hospital physiotherapist and dad was a farmer. They gave up a lot of time, effort and sacrifice. I trained six days a week so they never had a chance to jump in the car on Friday nights to visit friends or family and come home on Sunday night. They never had time for themselves because I was always training, training, training.

CLEARLY, YOUR PARENTS WERE VERY HARD WORKERS. DID THAT RUB OFF ON YOU?

In East Germany, ice-skating was purely for amateurs. I still don’t think seeing a cheque in your mind really brings out the best, as I believe winning has a higher meaning. It became normal to get up at six, go to school, go skating and then get home at seven before homework and bed.

YOU GREW UP IN EAST GERMANY DURING THE COLD WAR. HOW AWARE WERE YOU OF HARDSHIP?

In a lucky way, my sport was very much supported in East Germany and I was able to fulfil my dreams as an athlete. When you reach a certain level, you live in a bubble when all you think, dream and breathe is becoming the best athlete in the world. I was very grateful because if we’d lived in England I don’t think we’d have been able to afford the skates, costumes and choreography whereas in East Germany the sport was free. As a teenager, I was fortunate to travel and could see that other countries were more colourful with more things to buy in the stores, but I always wanted to go back home to my family.

HAS THERE EVER BEEN A TIME WHEN YOU STRUGGLED AND WORRIED HOW YOU WERE GOING TO PAY THE BILLS?

Luckily never. For a long time I lived with my parents so everything was taken care of. I rented my first apartment when I was just 19 which was very young and unusual in East Germany. I skated as an amateur until I was 22 before turning professional so I always earned my money through skating. Then I founded a production company, produced shows, wrote books or articles, but I’ve always earned my money through creative fields.

BEING A TOP FIGURE SKATER REQUIRES PHENOMENAL HARD GRAFT. DID THAT INFLUENCE YOUR DECISION TO KEEP WORKING AFTER YOU RETIRED?

When you look at a lot of world-class athletes, they’re used to working hard for success. You train until you earn it, nothing falls in your lap and you take this attitude through your life. Sometimes, success almost haunts you. You want to be the best at everything you do and know you have to work hard.

‘TIME’ MAGAZINE LABELLED YOU THE ‘MOST BEAUTIFUL FACE OF SOCIALISM’. WAS THAT A HELP OR HINDRANCE FOR YOUR CAREER?

I thought it was very charming because at that time Eastern Bloc athletes were portrayed like machines, which was wrong. But East German athletes weren’t allowed to talk to the Western press so there were a lot of myths. Today, modern track and field athletes are far more flamboyant, but in my day it was different. Did it help? Of course, but I also hope it was down to the way I treated people and the way I influenced skating.

PREMIERSHIP FOOTBALLERS EARN MILLIONS OF POUNDS. SHOULD ONLY MINORITY SPORTS BE ALLOWED IN THE OLYMPICS?

No. I think there should be a mixture. As an athlete, you choose your sport and are drawn into it but your passion should never be driven by fame and fortune but a desire to create something special that people will always remember.

ARE YOU A SPENDER OR A SAVER?

Both. I like spending money but I don’t spend big money. For instance, I love fashion but I’d rather buy an expensive bag that I use for years than a very expensive dress, which I wear once. Of course, because of my job, I need a good wardrobe but it’s my good excuse! Luckily I can walk into a store, pick things and buy them but I don’t spend £10,000 and I don’t need a garage full of cars.

WHAT’S BEEN YOUR BEST FINANCIAL MOVE?

Definitely investing in real estate. I’ve got good people who advise me and so far it’s worked really well. I’m not a risky investor and I’d rather make my own earnings than depend on my earnings working for me, otherwise you can lose very easily.

DURING YOUR CAREER YOU WON 12 MEDALS, MODELLED FOR AMERICAN ‘PLAYBOY’, HAVE BEEN A PRODUCER, AUTHOR AND TV SHOW JUDGE. DID YOU ALWAYS PLAN YOUR CAREER OR HAVE OPPORTUNITIES JUST COME YOUR WAY?

No never, I took my sport year by year. I wanted to be European champion, then world champion and Olympic champion. After that, you say “That’s it!” or you go after more records – and I stayed in sport because I loved what I was doing. After the 1988 Olympics I turned professional, but in this career you can’t have a five-year plan. I wanted to do quality work to give me longevity. Almost nothing is presented to you on a silver platter. You have to really work for it.

IN 1998 YOU MODELLED FOR ‘PLAYBOY’ AND THE ISSUE WAS ONLY THE SECOND TO SELL OUT (THE FIRST WAS IN 1953 FEATURING MARILYN MONROE). WAS THAT A HARD DECISION OR DID YOU FEEL EMPOWERED?

No, it was the right moment. Some girls did Playboy to enhance their career but at this point I was at my peak. I was the most successful figure skater in the world, touring more than 60 cities in America and travelling by private jet. I was filming the movie Ronin with Robert De Niro. It was an incredible year and when the Playboy offer came in I thought, why not? For 10 years I turned it down but they gave me all the rights for choosing the photographer, location and how the pictures looked.

WAS THE ‘PLAYBOY’ SHOOT VERY LUCRATIVE?

Definitely but that wasn’t the reason I did it. After 10 very successful years as a professional skater I felt stuck with a cute, pretty, ice princess image. I wanted to change people’s perceptions but it was important that the pictures were sensual so I chose natural settings, the beach and in water where it was completely natural to have no clothes rather than be provocative in stockings or sexy lingerie. It worked and to me the biggest compliment was that more women than men bought the magazine.

WHAT SORT OF TIPPER ARE YOU?

Usually 10pc or 15pc. If the service is good, I tip more.

IS THERE ANYTHING YOU’D CHANGE ABOUT THE WAY YOU DO BUSINESS?

Truthfully I’ve never cared about money, about how much I make or need. I always wanted to be paid well but it wasn’t important that it was the biggest cheque. Instead, I do it for the work, joy and the challenge.

DOES MONEY MAKE YOU HAPPY?

Money gives you freedom, which makes you happy. It gives you independence and a safety net but you can easily lose money if you make a wrong investment or your home burns down. I don’t think you should ever take anything for granted in life.

Blog extra: Katarina in action on the ice.

Tulisa is feminism’s new hero

News for 24 March 2012 has been taken from The Guardian.

Viewed from its highest point, the internet is a landscape of celebrity sex tapes. Pamela Anderson, Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian made the genre famous. Their careers to date have still to escape the shadow of those dark videos – and still the films keep coming.

Last week, a clip starring the 23-year-old X Factor judge Tulisa Contostavlos and an apparently disembodied penis appeared online. But, in an unprecedented move, during the ensuing tabloid racket and the censorious blogs with their variations on the word “slut”, Tulisa responded with a new video.

Also shot in dim light, in what looks like the corridor of her flat, she told fans “her side of the story”.

“When you share an intimate moment with someone you love, that you care about and trust,” she said, holding up her holiday pictures of ex-boyfriend Justin Edwards, the man who leaked the clip, “you never imagine that at any point it will be shared with people around the world.”

She added: “It’s a pretty tough time for me, but I don’t feel I should be the one to take the heat for it. This is something he took upon himself, to put the footage online… I’m not going to sit here and be violated or taken advantage of.”

She tweeted a link on Wednesday; watching it I whooped out loud. I did so because, as well as being a threat to the traditional post-sex tape narrative, where the woman is quietly disgraced, this was an unlikely feminist moment. A noisy, true, important message to Tulisa’s teenage fans. They may well have some personal experience of this kind off thing – 40% of teenagers have texted naked pictures of themselves or received pictures of their acquaintances. In a survey of 11,000 teens, aged 11-14, four in 10 thought it was “appropriate” to forward their friends’ pictures of classmates topless: the survey showed a significant shift from a time when young people merely viewed internet pornography, to today, when they create it.

Much has changed, too, since Anderson’s day, when the stars of a sex tape, baby oiled, siliconed and candlelit, were in on it together: however coy the couple might have been when a film went viral, the woman was probably complicit in its release. In order for a tape to leak 10 years ago, an actual “tape” would physically have to change hands. Today, sex tapes (sex MP4s? Sex mov.files?) can be filmed covertly and lurk on many boys’ iPhones, but the notoriety that the woman must live with when they’re screened remains.

As much as I whooped at Tulisa’s video, I can only imagine how uplifting it might have been for young people to watch; people like “A”, a girl I know whose teenage years were torturous because an ex-boyfriend forwarded intimate pictures of her to his new girlfriend, who went on to publish them online.

The pictures inspired violent bullying, led to weeks off school, friends lost and exams failed. When she tried to change schools her teacher recommended against it, sighing that a move wouldn’t be enough – the pictures had percolated the whole town. The pictures remain there, I’m sure, engraved on the internet like initials on a desk. A’s ex-boyfriend, incidentally, left for sixth form a hero.

Sex tapes are not uncommon, but what is rare is for their female star to be unapologetic on their release. To discuss ideas of shame, intimacy, consent and privacy, instead of agreeing to a sad-faced interview in the Sun, pictured in polo-neck and natural makeup to denote modesty – that’s unusual.

There’s no shame in happy sex, Tulisa asserts. The shame should lie with the person who uses it as currency against his partner’s wishes, who uses a record of it as a weapon. She’s not in the wrong for having sex, for enjoying sex, or for being filmed – her (until now anonymous) ex should be ashamed for betraying her, embarrassing her and attempting to damage her career.

And to broadcast this message on her own terms to “tell her side of the story” without the firm, clammy hand of a manager or editor influencing her words, does a lot to chip away at our solid wall of cynicism. After all, much of the attraction of a celebrity sex tape is the rare opportunity to see a star un-PRed – the “real” them.

It’s always fascinating when a celebrity reclaims the power of a scandal, ripping it from the claws of the media, then handing it back, reshaped.

Like Max Mosley, who used the News of the World’s exposé of his S&M parties with prostitutes to first sue the paper for breaching his privacy, then bring a case against the UK’s privacy laws in an attempt to force the press to warn subjects before publishing stories about them, Tulisa has bitten back.

In today’s muddy, laddie world, we take our feminist moments where we find them. Just as it was exciting to hear celebrities taking on the press during the Leveson inquiry, it’s thrilling to watch Tulisa take revenge on both the man who exploited her and the commentators who passed judgment. And using the tools most often exploited to hurt girls (Twitter, where hashtags like ‘#iHateWomen’ trend, and YouTube, under each video a stained ribbon of sexist comments) in order to deliver her message too.

Imagine if every shamed female celebrity, every reality star pictured smoking while pregnant, every untoned actress holidaying in a bikini, were to do the same. A high-pitched cacophony of raging women, broadcasting on YouTube, their hair slightly fallen after a day dodging doorsteppers. Women off the telly but without autocues, reminding us that they go deeper than an image, or than a simple statement from their manager.

At a time when our privacy seems to be leaking out from between our clasped hands, with Google revealing plans to track our movements across the vast, bumpy map of the web and Twitter admitting that it grabs users’ address book data, Tulisa’s is a modern lesson in image management.

When embarrassing information leaves your control today it’s not just your family that might see it. It’s not just a diary left open on a bed, a sheaf of nude beach snaps forgotten on the counter, it’s information that the whole world can access.

When this happens (and celebrities, darlings, it will) instead of hiding away, or reading out the same scripted apology we’ve heard a thousand times, one that “regrets” and “takes responsibility for actions”, one that says sorry for “letting down fans”, Tulisa’s is a guide to guerrilla action.

By reclaiming the internet tools, by taking ownership of the event, by speaking out “in her own words” and refusing to be shamed, she’s sketched out plans that every scandalous soap star and broken politician can follow. Inside, I’m still whooping.

Watch the video Tulisa released.

Blog extra: We ‘pinned’ this story two days ago.

World Water Day celebrated by women around the globe

News for 23 March 2010 has been taken from Women’s Views on News.

Today is UN World Water Day (WWD). A day which campaigners around the globe are using to raise awareness of the role of women in maintaining and  sustaining access to water and sanitation. WWD highlights the threats posed by growing populations and climate change to our water and food resources, and how this is likely to increase over the next 50 years.

Water shortages are fundamentally connected with women and gender equality around the globe, as these stories illustrate:

  • The UN has been training rural women in China to use cutting-edge water-saving irrigation technology. As men increasingly leave for jobs in the cities, women are left behind to look after the farm as well as the home. UN Women has designed a project which trains female farmers to use, manage and maintain irrigation infrastructure, whilst actively promoting understanding of gender equality within their communities.
  • In Tibet, the Tibetan Women’s Association are using WWD to launch a video entitled ‘Experts Speak on Tibet’s Environment’. The idea is to draw attention to their struggle against the pollution and flooding of Tibetan water sources caused by mining and damming in the region.
  • In Africawomen advocates are using WWD to highlight the importance of the sustainable management of fresh water resources, and the need to involve women in the policy process.  From the long journeys made to collect water, to caring for those sick through water-borne diseases, to how a lack of availability of clean water adds stress to women’s role as resource managers, African women have a deep understanding of water related problems and needs.

To find out more about World Water Day 2012, visit the United Nations or Wateraid websites.

Blog extra: Watch the UN World Water Day video.